Answer :
In the case of Shaw v. Reno (1993), the ruling was that racial gerrymandering can violate the Fourteenth Amendment unless it achieves a compelling state interest.
Racial gerrymandering refers to the manipulation of electoral district boundaries to favor one racial group over another. The Fourteenth Amendment guarantees equal protection under the law and prohibits racial discrimination. The ruling in Shaw v. Reno established that if the redistricting plan is primarily motivated by race and lacks a compelling state interest, it can be considered unconstitutional.
This case set a precedent for evaluating the constitutionality of redistricting plans and the impact of race in the electoral process. It highlights the importance of ensuring fair representation for all citizens regardless of their race or ethnicity.
Learn more about Shaw v. Reno https://brainly.com/question/26599632
#SPJ11