• Law
College

Which of the following statements regarding the legality of gerrymandering is most accurate?

A. Racial gerrymandering is legal, but partisan gerrymandering is not.
B. Racial gerrymandering is illegal, and so is partisan gerrymandering.
C. Racial gerrymandering is illegal, but partisan gerrymandering is not.
D. Both racial gerrymandering and partisan gerrymandering are legal.

Answer :

Final answer:

Racial gerrymandering is illegal as it violates the Voting Rights Act, while partisan gerrymandering is not considered illegal by current Supreme Court standards. This complexity makes it important to distinguish between the two types when discussing their legality. The accurate statement is that racial gerrymandering is illegal, but partisan gerrymandering is not.


Explanation:

Understanding Gerrymandering Legality

Gerrymandering involves the manipulation of electoral district boundaries to favor a particular political party or group. The legality of gerrymandering can be complex, particularly when distinguishing between racial gerrymandering and partisan gerrymandering.

Racial gerrymandering is deemed illegal by the U.S. Supreme Court, as it violates the Voting Rights Act and aims to dilute the voting strength of racial minorities. This means that any districting plan specifically designed to disadvantage voters based on race cannot be legally upheld.

On the other hand, partisan gerrymandering remains a contentious legal issue. While it is often criticized as unethical and manipulative, current Supreme Court rulings suggest that it is not unconstitutional unless it can be shown to violate specific criteria or laws, which can make it legally permissible in certain contexts.

Thus, the most accurate statement regarding the legality of gerrymandering is: Racial gerrymandering is illegal, but partisan gerrymandering is not.


Learn more about Gerrymandering here:

https://brainly.com/question/36770248


Other Questions