Answer :
Final answer:
Redistricting's effectiveness under independent, state-level commissions c. depends on various factors, including commission selection and district drawing criteria. While offering a promising solution to gerrymandering, the success of such commissions is not assured and relies heavily on execution.
Explanation:
Redistricting is indeed a partisan issue that significantly impacts electoral outcomes and political representation. The debate centers around whether independent, state-level redistricting commissions can provide a solution to the gerrymandering problem.
The effectiveness of such commissions largely c. depends on various factors, including how the commission members are selected, the criteria used for drawing districts, and the transparency of the process. Independent commissions, like the one in California, aim to draw political district boundaries in a way that fosters competition and diminishes political extremism.
However, the selection of commission members itself can be contentious, as achieving true non-partisanship is challenging. An ideal commission should strive for a balance, including members from multiple political parties and independents, to ensure a broad representation of voter interests.
The creation of districts that are competitive and reflective of communities' interests can help combat the extreme polarization seen in districts drawn with partisan motives.
Therefore, while independent commissions offer a promising approach to addressing gerrymandering, their success is not guaranteed and heavily depends on implementation details.