Answer :
Final answer:
The logical concept in Frank Goodbody's statement could be deduced if the actual statement was available. Deductive reasoning proceeds from general to specific conclusions, Inductive reasoning from specific to general, Abductive reasoning takes an educated guess based on incomplete information, and Syllogism is a type of deductive reasoning with a major and minor premise leading to a conclusion.
Explanation:
Without specific context or content from automotive expert Frank Goodbody's statement, it's impossible to definitively identify the logical concept being utilised. However, I'll go through each option so you understand each logical concept better.
Deductive reasoning starts with a broad statement or principle, and is used to infer specific conclusions based on that information. An example would be, if all cars are vehicles (broad statement) and a BMW is a car (specific inference), then a BMW is a vehicle (deductive conclusion).
Inductive reasoning, on the other hand, moves from specific observations to broader generalizations. If you observe that your car engine heats up every time you drive over 60mph, you might infer that all car engines heat up when driven at high speed.
Abductive reasoning is often used when there is incomplete information. It makes an educated guess based on observation. An example would be if your car isn't starting, an abduction might be that your car battery is dead.
Syllogism is a type of deductive reasoning where there are two statements made (a 'major' and a 'minor' premise), which lead to a conclusion. For instance, 'all cars need fuel to run' (major premise), 'this is a car' (minor premise), therefore 'this vehicle needs fuel to run' (conclusion).
Learn more about Logical reasoning here:
https://brainly.com/question/34212737
#SPJ11