Answer :
The risk of expropriation affects the economic endowments of the two nations by creating different incentives for investment and resource exploitation. In this scenario, country B, where there is no risk of confiscation, is likely to be richer than country A.
The absence of expropriation risk in country B provides a more favorable investment climate, encouraging private companies and investors to engage in mining activities and capitalize on the iron ore endowment. This leads to increased exploration, production, and technological advancements, which ultimately contribute to economic growth and prosperity. In contrast, the risk of confiscation in country A discourages investment and hinders the development of the mining sector, limiting the economic benefits that could be derived from the iron ore endowment.
As for the widespread political support for government policies that expropriate resources from some groups for redistribution, it can stem from various factors such as social and economic inequality, political ideologies, and the desire to address historical injustices. These policies are often driven by the intention to achieve a more equitable distribution of resources and reduce disparities among different groups in society. However, the effectiveness and consequences of such policies can vary depending on their implementation and the overall economic and political context.
To learn more about technological advancements, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/24197105
#SPJ11