Answer :
Final answer:
The Supreme Court ruled in Hunt v. Cromartie (1999) that drawing 'safe' districts for both political parties was permissible, which made political gerrymandering less likely to be legally challenged.
Explanation:
In the case of Hunt v. Cromartie (1999), the Supreme Court ruled that drawing "safe" districts for both political parties was deemed permissible. This means that politicians are allowed to create districts that favor their own party, as long as it does not discriminate against racial or ethnic minorities.
However, the ruling did not declare political gerrymandering unconstitutional or outlaw it in several states. It simply stated that if the district lines were drawn based on partisan factors rather than racial factors, it would not be considered a violation of the Constitution.
Therefore, political gerrymandering became less likely to be successfully challenged in court after the Hunt v. Cromartie decision.
Learn more about Hunt v. Cromartie here:
https://brainly.com/question/32179933
#SPJ1